Cancer therapy is typically applied at the highest dose that a patient can tolerate. Although this approach succeeds in shrinking tumors, it often fails in the long run because a minority of cancer cells are resistant to the treatment. These cells rapidly expand to fill the space left by the cells that were destroyed. Cancer regrowth has frequently been fatal.
Recently, mathematical oncologists have proposed a radically new approach to tackling this problem based on evolutionary principles. Known as containment or adaptive therapy, this as-yet unproven strategy aims to prevent or delay the failure of cancer treatment by exploiting competition between drug-sensitive and resistant cells. It uses relatively low doses and has the added potential benefits of reducing side effects and improving quality of life.
Spatial constraints within tumors
Dr. Robert Noble, a Lecturer in City’s Department of Mathematics, started working on adaptive therapy in collaboration with cancer cell biologists while he was a postodoctoral student in Montpellier, France:
“We validated the concept using a combination of biological, computational and mathematical models. In particular, we showed how spatial constraints within tumors can be exploited to suppress resistance to targeted therapy.”
Shortly after that study was published three years ago, Dr. Noble attended a workshop at the Lorentz Center in Leiden on the topic of understanding cancer through evolutionary game theory. There, he not only met his future City colleague, Professor Mark Broom, but also Dr. Yannick Viossat, a mathematician at Université Paris-Dauphine who had recently become interested in modeling cancer treatment.
Like Dr. Noble, Dr. Viossat was concerned that existing mathematical understanding of adaptive therapy was inadequate. As each study used a different model, set of assumptions, or parameter values, it was difficult to draw general insights. The pair of academics decided to collaborate to establish a more rigorous mathematical theory of tumor containment, unifying the various models that had been previously proposed.
Supported by a small grant from Fondation Mathématiques Jacques Hadamard, Dr. Noble and Dr. Viossat worked together for three years, occasionally meeting either in Paris, or in Basel, where Dr. Noble was pursuing his second postdoc.
Using mathematical analysis and numerical simulations, they established general conditions under which a containment strategy is expected to control tumor burden more effectively than applying the maximum tolerated dose. Importantly, they also identified conditions under which containment might fail to outperform standard of care. Their study was recently accepted for publication; an earlier version is available as a preprint.
Optimal treatment regimens
As interest in adaptive therapy is rapidly growing, Dr. Noble and Dr. Viossat decided to organize a workshop for mathematical modelers—like the one at which they met in Leiden—to survey the state of the art, discuss future directions, and foster collaborations. They held the four-day event online in December, with co-organizers from the US and South Korea. The virtual event was attended by one hundred persons who participated in more than twenty talks, interacting via the Sococo virtual meeting platform. Due to the success of this workshop it will become an annual event.
Having started as a Lecturer at City in July 2020, Dr. Noble plans to continue developing mathematical models to improve cancer treatment. His long-term objective is to design optimal treatment regimens for each tumor type, and ultimately each patient.
Starting this Summer, this network will provide 15 Ph.D. students with the training needed to further expand and advance the field of evolutionary game theory. EvoGamesPlus will focus on two applications: epidemiological modeling and the modeling of cancer and its treatment.
“I look forward to helping these students lead the way towards more effective clinical strategies based on mathematical and evolutionary insight.”
Katarina Bacevic et al. Spatial competition constrains resistance to targeted cancer therapy, Nature Communications (2017). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01516-1
Robert A. Gatenby. A change of strategy in the war on cancer, Nature (2009). DOI: 10.1038/459508a
Yannick Viossat et al. The logic of containing tumors, bioRxiv (2020). DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.22.915355
City University London
Using mathematics to test new approaches to cancer therapy (2021, January 8)
retrieved 8 January 2021
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.